Hearing alot about glasspacks.
#11
I just had a CherryBomb Glasspack muffler put on my Blazer replacing the stock muffler. What a waste of 30 bucks for the muffler, and 60 to have it put on. I'm ready to rip it off myself and have no muffler at all.
Makes no difference if it's on or just a straight pipe. Wouldn't recommend. Better off investing in something decent like the Flowmaster 40.
Makes no difference if it's on or just a straight pipe. Wouldn't recommend. Better off investing in something decent like the Flowmaster 40.
#12
I have a cherrybomb glasspack on my 86 it sounds great and pops real loud when im in stop and go and my engine is only a 2.8 lol
ps i get 23.6 mpg
ps i get 23.6 mpg
#13
I don't want to offend you, but you should pick up a book or two and learn how an internal combustion engine works instead of leading people astray with erroneous statements such as the one above. Back pressure is very real.
Sorry, but that's just not true. There is a ton of information available from various manufacturers and magazine reviews that show significant gains in hp, torque and mpg by doing nothing more than installing an aftermarket cat-back exhaust system. Yes, you will see a higher gain if you also install headers, but an increase of 8-10 hp, 12-15 lb-ft of torque and a 1-2 mpg increase are realistic and has been proven over and over again on the dyno. Sure, maybe if you just pick a muffler because of the way it sounds and slap it on in place of the stock one you may not see a difference, but if you install a properly designed cat-back system it's quite possible to see the increases mentioned above. If you think what I'm saying is incorrect then I suggest you do some independant research rather than basing your opinion on hear-say. Again, I'm not trying to offend you, but if you had done the research previously you would know the truth and wouldn't have made the statements you did.
Sorry, but that's just not true. There is a ton of information available from various manufacturers and magazine reviews that show significant gains in hp, torque and mpg by doing nothing more than installing an aftermarket cat-back exhaust system. Yes, you will see a higher gain if you also install headers, but an increase of 8-10 hp, 12-15 lb-ft of torque and a 1-2 mpg increase are realistic and has been proven over and over again on the dyno. Sure, maybe if you just pick a muffler because of the way it sounds and slap it on in place of the stock one you may not see a difference, but if you install a properly designed cat-back system it's quite possible to see the increases mentioned above. If you think what I'm saying is incorrect then I suggest you do some independant research rather than basing your opinion on hear-say. Again, I'm not trying to offend you, but if you had done the research previously you would know the truth and wouldn't have made the statements you did.
#14
I just had a CherryBomb Glasspack muffler put on my Blazer replacing the stock muffler. What a waste of 30 bucks for the muffler, and 60 to have it put on. I'm ready to rip it off myself and have no muffler at all.
Makes no difference if it's on or just a straight pipe. Wouldn't recommend. Better off investing in something decent like the Flowmaster 40.
Makes no difference if it's on or just a straight pipe. Wouldn't recommend. Better off investing in something decent like the Flowmaster 40.
Read the last line of my last post...
#15
I think Benedict was talking about having 3" Pipes is too larger for a stock Blazer. 2.5" works fine and for True dual you can run 2" or 2.25" Straight pipes if you wanted and make killer low end and mid end.
http://www.superchevy.com/technical/...exh/index.html
A motor never needs backpressure when theres results that show that no restriction is what wanted and nothing but solid flow, and how the size of the pipes affect where the power band is and the rpms the engine can function more effectively http://www.pontiacstreetperformance....p/exhaust.html
Last edited by PaulO2288; 10-17-2010 at 01:19 AM.
#16
'the only way of loosing or gaining power in an exhaust system is if you replace everything, headers, high flow cat, performance exhaust 3" pipes the whole way back. without that there is no gains or looses that are noticeable'
I agree - you want to reduce back pressure and restriction in the exhaust system to improve efficiency. Your statement validates what I have been saying all along. Back pressure is real - not a myth.
Last edited by 01BlackBeauty; 10-17-2010 at 07:50 AM.
#17
But that's not what he said:
'the only way of loosing or gaining power in an exhaust system is if you replace everything, headers, high flow cat, performance exhaust 3" pipes the whole way back. without that there is no gains or looses that are noticeable'
But still yet again your not realizing backpressure and scavenging are 2 Totally different things!!! Backpressure is a restriction on the flow of an exhaust. An exhaust needing backpressure makes about as much sense as having a restriction on your intake where is stopping flow.
I agree - you want to reduce back pressure and restriction in the exhaust system to improve efficiency. Your statement validates what I have been saying all along. Back pressure is real - not a myth.
Did you at all look at those links posted? I can find so many more to show you that backpressure is bad, not needed at all to make power, and its exhaust scavenging thats needed
#18
Don't forget too, a hot exhaust flows more than a cold exhaust...
#19
#20
I agree...
...In my opinion, any aftermarket muffler sounds like **** on a 4.3! I don't care if you have a single $100 Flowmaster, or 6 separate pipes from each cylinder with 6 different mufflers attached to all pipes, they all sound like butt... (I have to admit, I have never seen or heard that setup, so I may be incorrect,) but I am assuming it too, would sound like buttocks.
...In my opinion, any aftermarket muffler sounds like **** on a 4.3! I don't care if you have a single $100 Flowmaster, or 6 separate pipes from each cylinder with 6 different mufflers attached to all pipes, they all sound like butt... (I have to admit, I have never seen or heard that setup, so I may be incorrect,) but I am assuming it too, would sound like buttocks.