Macro is a close up shot of an object.
However, I guess it doesn't truly qualify because it doesn't have a set object. Whatever, I'll need to get a second opinion from Oktain because he's sorta like the Contest mod and my personal body guard. :p Come on Blazin'! You know what can't allow that here lol. |
alright, alright, ill get a better pic, just gotta find one....
|
macro doesnt have an infinite focus though, i would be ok with it if the crowd was blurred out and just the end of the fender was clear, that would look more macro than the posted shot (and dont get me wrong im not trying to rock the boat, im just saying.)
if you go on flickr and look under macro groups or anything there isnt a single scenery picture, or a shot that shows a whole panel of a vehicle. let alone the whole side. this is how i would define my best macro shots... https://farm4.static.flickr.com/3126...1f1b069c75.jpg https://farm4.static.flickr.com/3125...f59fe0f665.jpg https://farm6.static.flickr.com/5018...875e4fb66a.jpg they are as follows: first is a spider web sprayed with hair spray (small spider less than the size of a dime with all legs out) second is salt on a glass table or black folder, i forget. third is the air bubbles beside the glass bubbles inside the glass bubble on part of my bong.... hahaha i left these out of our contest because i wasnt sure if you meant microscopic macro or just a regular macro i could have shot with my Blackberry. :D |
Originally Posted by BlazinClinton
(Post 420327)
lol sweet, loose rools. that last chevy is NOT macro!
im gonna use this to an advantage! -am i allowed? :P Edit: is porn allowed? i have the sweetest shot ever of a pierced... ummm well female body part. EDIT Here's my submission, taken with my 50mm f/1.8. Played with the curves in CS5 a little bit but that's it. http://i560.photobucket.com/albums/s...ondie00057.jpg I'm not 100% on how I framed it though lol. |
Originally Posted by BlazinClinton
(Post 420469)
macro doesnt have an infinite focus though, i would be ok with it if the crowd was blurred out and just the end of the fender was clear, that would look more macro than the posted shot (and dont get me wrong im not trying to rock the boat, im just saying.)
if you go on flickr and look under macro groups or anything there isnt a single scenery picture, or a shot that shows a whole panel of a vehicle. let alone the whole side. this is how i would define my best macro i left these out of our contest because i wasnt sure if you meant microscopic macro or just a regular macro i could have shot with my Blackberry. :D |
ok, i need the verdict on the new pic. if its still not acceptable, i have another photo
|
Originally Posted by 1999 Black Blazer
(Post 420555)
ok, i need the verdict on the new pic. if its still not acceptable, i have another photo
|
no, never mind, i'm going with my other choice
|
I still don't see any pictures you posted... What's up with that?
|
It's on the first page, guys.
I like it. That'll work! |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands