Performance & Brainstorming Want to free up some HP? Looking at headers? Ask your performance related questions here!

ECM/Programming differences

  #21  
Old 01-22-2008, 03:19 AM
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 31
blazerbeam is an unknown quantity at this point
Default RE: ECM/Programming differences

the 4l60E tranny was taken out after 03 or 04 i believe
 
  #22  
Old 01-22-2008, 03:29 AM
BF Veteran
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: GP AB CA
Posts: 3,946
drperry is a jewel in the roughdrperry is a jewel in the roughdrperry is a jewel in the rough
Default RE: ECM/Programming differences

I doubt that... It's still in the trucks... At the very least 4.3 powered 1/2 tons still have it, if not the smaller V8s... I'd imagine that the bigger V8's get the 4L80E.

Though, I don't have either one.

What did it get replaced with? GM wouldn't likely spend the money to drop an all new transmission into a vehicle they're discontinuing..
 
  #23  
Old 01-22-2008, 06:56 AM
swartlkk's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 41,064
swartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond repute
Default RE: ECM/Programming differences

My Rainier has the 4L60E! The Trailblazer SS got the 4L65E. The Trailblazer 4.2L & 5.3L still use the 4L60E even now. Only the LS-based 6.0L TBSS got the 4L65E...
 
  #24  
Old 01-23-2008, 05:48 AM
BF Veteran
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: GP AB CA
Posts: 3,946
drperry is a jewel in the roughdrperry is a jewel in the roughdrperry is a jewel in the rough
Default RE: ECM/Programming differences

I don't think the 4L60E will ever die... It's GM's most common transmission... It bolts up to pretty much any motor they have
 
  #25  
Old 03-21-2008, 01:19 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location:
Posts: 12
MindzEyeWRX02 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default RE: ECM/Programming differences

ORIGINAL: drperry
It's really only useful if you've done mods to give your truck more power in the higher RPM's...

The 4.3 kinda falls on its face at over 5000RPM anyway, that's why I dropped the limiter to 5200, lol.
does it take into account what mods you have made?? i've been reading on this and cant figure out if it just raises the limiters.

i have a Cobb Accessport, an Engine Management System, for my Subaru. you connect it through the diagnostic access point and the Cobb Accessport downloads its software into the ECU (electronic computer unit). from there you can add mods and use maps in the Accessport designed for each mod.

just wondering if there is anything out there for a blazer that is similer. in case i want to start modding the GFs Blazer
 
  #26  
Old 03-21-2008, 03:46 AM
BF Veteran
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: GP AB CA
Posts: 3,946
drperry is a jewel in the roughdrperry is a jewel in the roughdrperry is a jewel in the rough
Default RE: ECM/Programming differences

EFI Live or HP Tuners are pretty much your only bet for modding like that.

Jet, Hypertech and stuff like that have pre-made "generic" tunes in them.
 
  #27  
Old 03-21-2008, 10:37 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location:
Posts: 12
MindzEyeWRX02 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default RE: ECM/Programming differences

Thanks. I'll read up on those two options.

I know with subaru's, If you start modding intake, or turbo back exhaust system you have to tune for each mod or you'll mess up your car due to the change in air fuel ratio and other variables that get changed with each mod. Does that go for Blazers??
 
  #28  
Old 03-21-2008, 03:34 PM
BF Veteran
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: GP AB CA
Posts: 3,946
drperry is a jewel in the roughdrperry is a jewel in the roughdrperry is a jewel in the rough
Default RE: ECM/Programming differences

Adding an intake and exhaust to the Blazer doesn't really require any tuning... It frees up restrictions in the stock system, letting the engine breath as it should.

It's a little different for your Subie because of the turbo.
 
  #29  
Old 03-21-2008, 03:59 PM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location:
Posts: 12
MindzEyeWRX02 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default RE: ECM/Programming differences

Got it. Thanks, so will tuning the blazer with the mods help with performance and reliability??

I was never really into cars. Had a 93 subaru impreza L before my wrx and i was into suspension, not really power. Since i've gotten my WRX i've been getting more and more into cars, particularly subaru's. but now that i know what i want to do with my subaru and I cant put in a bigger turbo system until i save up for a 6speed transmission swap, i figure i would mod my GFs blazer. The "modding bug" i tell yeah, once you start, you cant get enough. hahaha
 
  #30  
Old 03-22-2008, 04:19 AM
BF Veteran
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: GP AB CA
Posts: 3,946
drperry is a jewel in the roughdrperry is a jewel in the roughdrperry is a jewel in the rough
Default RE: ECM/Programming differences

A good tune will help any vehicle, even if it's bone stock, but after an intake upgrade, and exhaust upgrade, you don't really need to tune it any...
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: ECM/Programming differences


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

© 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands