![]() |
Throttle Body mod
Has anyone done the Throttle body mod on there 4.3l vortek? I was thinking about doing it today and wanted to have some others opinions on it, like do you get more torque and does it save gas, from what I've heard it does and could get atleast another mile per gallon. And the mod I'm talking about is cutting that scoop thing that's on the bottom side of the throttle plate
|
Many have, myself included on my old 2000 Bravada. About the only thing I can say for sure that it did was make the throttle more sensitive. As for more torque, power, or better mileage, I noticed none of these. Some will argue that it produces more power/torque, but my counter to that is that it is producing the same power/torque, just at a lower throttle angle. Wide open throttle runs from 0-60 recorded on my old Autotap PC based scantool showed absolutely zero difference in 0-60 time pre/post modification on a 5 run average. I didn't mind the overly sensitive throttle, but my wife refused to drive the truck after I did this modification.
You can search for "throttle+body+mod" or "throttle+blade+mod" and find what others have to say and/or take a look at the Related Topics links at the bottom of this post. |
agree with Swartlik. It is there for you to be able to control accel.
|
Originally Posted by newguy
(Post 672787)
agree with Swartlik. It is there for you to be able to control accel.
|
Originally Posted by swartlkk
(Post 672781)
Many have, myself included on my old 2000 Bravada. About the only thing I can say for sure that it did was make the throttle more sensitive. As for more torque, power, or better mileage, I noticed none of these. Some will argue that it produces more power/torque, but my counter to that is that it is producing the same power/torque, just at a lower throttle angle. Wide open throttle runs from 0-60 recorded on my old Autotap PC based scantool showed absolutely zero difference in 0-60 time pre/post modification on a 5 run average. I didn't mind the overly sensitive throttle, but my wife refused to drive the truck after I did this modification.
You can search for "throttle+body+mod" or "throttle+blade+mod" and find what others have to say and/or take a look at the Related Topics links at the bottom of this post. |
Not trying to jinx you. I've read threads here from members who got a check engine light after throttle body mods. They solved it by putting an unaltered one back on.
|
Originally Posted by Rusty Nuts
(Post 672799)
Not trying to jinx you. I've read threads here from members who got a check engine light after throttle body mods. They solved it by putting an unaltered one back on.
|
Originally Posted by ThaDopeShow
(Post 672793)
I just moded my 2001 chevy blazer an hour ago and it has given alot faster acceleration
|
In my day that was flipping the air filter cover.
|
Originally Posted by Rusty Nuts
(Post 672806)
In my day that was flipping the air filter cover.
|
Heck Yeah! I loved my Quadrajunk.
|
We had a 73 K10 and a 74 heavy K20 on the farm growing up. I started tuning them up when I was 10 and could make those old qjets work great. If I remember correctly I did my first well plug reseal at 12!
My K5 still has the old qjet on it and it runs great! I had to rebush the primary throttle shaft and seal the well plugs, but that's common on them. |
Originally Posted by swartlkk
(Post 672805)
It's the old "I did something therefore I notice a difference" effect.
|
Originally Posted by ThaDopeShow
(Post 672811)
Naw I wouldn't say it has more acceleration if it didn't, I have done 0 to 60 in 12 seconds like 6 months ago and I just did another 0 to 60 in 9 seconds, so yeah it has more acceleration.
|
Originally Posted by swartlkk
(Post 672812)
You timed one of those incorrectly if you picked up 3 seconds (25% improvement). :icon_screwy:
|
The only difference the mod makes is from closed throttle it will open and allow air into the TB a bit quicker so it will feel more "peppy" from a stop to about 1/4 throttle but slamming the pedal to the floor will have the same effect with the blade there or not. I don't see 3 full seconds being shaved by a mod that only has a small effect below 1/4 throttle at best. I have done this mod myself and do think it makes a small difference from a stop but nothing more.
|
Originally Posted by ThaDopeShow
(Post 672814)
How could I do it wrong, I've video recorded both times and I've watched them both and timed them on a stopwatch
Either one of your tests was uphill (pre-mod) and the next was downhill, you slapped a turbo on, or something else was influencing your results. Regardless, your findings are flawed as they aren't even in the realm of believable. The reason I mention '5 run average' in my previous post is for this very case where something isn't right in one or both of your runs. A 5 run average would have shown you that something was off. |
Originally Posted by swartlkk
(Post 672816)
25% improvement would be the equivalent of adding 40-50HP which this mod DEFINITELY does not do.
Either one of your tests was uphill (pre-mod) and the next was downhill, you slapped a turbo on, or something else was influencing your results. Regardless, your findings are flawed as they aren't even in the realm of believable. The reason I mention '5 run average' in my previous post is for this very case where something isn't right in one or both of your runs. A 5 run average would have shown you that something was off. |
Originally Posted by swartlkk
(Post 672816)
25% improvement would be the equivalent of adding 40-50HP which this mod DEFINITELY does not do.
Either one of your tests was uphill (pre-mod) and the next was downhill, you slapped a turbo on, or something else was influencing your results. Regardless, your findings are flawed as they aren't even in the realm of believable. The reason I mention '5 run average' in my previous post is for this very case where something isn't right in one or both of your runs. A 5 run average would have shown you that something was off. |
Unless you put a stock throttle blade on ran 5 passes from the exact same starting point to the exact same ending point and then immediately swapped to a modified blade on and ran the exact same setup 5 more times and take the average from before and after you are not getting accurate results.
|
Temperature has A LOT to do with things as does accessories being driven. What was it, 90F+ six months ago in FL and now somewhere around 70F? Probably don't have to run the AC much this time of year. Just that means your observations are flawed and now you mention a sh!t ton of additional work htat has been done to it...
Just to put some more info out there, I saw just under a 0.8 second difference in the 0-60 averages for AC-on vs. AC-off in my old Bravada on a 85F day, absolutely no other variances and allowing a 10 minute idle session between each of the 10 total runs. Listen, I completely believe that you think your truck got faster and if that makes you happy, good. |
Originally Posted by rexmburns
(Post 672822)
Unless you put a stock throttle blade on ran 5 passes from the exact same starting point to the exact same ending point and then immediately swapped to a modified blade on and ran the exact same setup 5 more times and take the average from before and after you are not getting accurate results.
|
You have already invalidated your 12 second time, there is no question there. No need to further try to push your gains as no one here is buying it. That's why I said that if you're happy, good. No matter what you do from here on out (short of testing it with a stock throttle blade) will change my opinion of your comparison as it involved a truck with compromised injection, ignition, and various other systems for the pre-mod test.
|
Originally Posted by swartlkk
(Post 672829)
You have already invalidated your 12 second time, there is no question there. No need to further try to push your gains as no one here is buying it. That's why I said that if you're happy, good. No matter what you do from here on out (short of testing it with a stock throttle blade) will change my opinion of your comparison as it involved a truck with compromised injection, ignition, and various other systems for the pre-mod test.
|
Originally Posted by ThaDopeShow
(Post 672833)
Yup I'm happy with it and that's all that matters because it runs awesome actually better then brand new, I also have a jet performance stage 1 chip in it to but I had that in it over 6 months ago.
|
There is no need to talk like that too other members. Keep things respectful for everyone's sake please.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56 PM. |
© 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands