1st Generation S-series (1983-1994) Tech Discuss 1st generation S-series (1983-1994) general tech topics here.

I'm only getting 14 mpg?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 05:26 PM
  #11  
warthogdriver's Avatar
BF Veteran
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,785
From: Bay City, Michigan
warthogdriver is a jewel in the roughwarthogdriver is a jewel in the roughwarthogdriver is a jewel in the roughwarthogdriver is a jewel in the rough
Default

sounds like my ride...i avg 14.5 mpg...now that i upgraded the overhead console...i am depressed reading that.
i do get 22 on highway...just alot of crappy city driving.
 
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 07:25 PM
  #12  
Blazers.B.Kewl's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 277
From: Massachusetts
Blazers.B.Kewl is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Originally Posted by musclecar70sfan
No problem... I make the same mistakes all the time lol. Thanks for the advice! Regarding the thermostat, my temp gauge (on the dash) usually hangs around in the 170-185 range. Is that OK?
I think that's good. Mine usually hangs around there. just over halfway up to the 200 mark right? That's about where it should be.
 
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 08:29 PM
  #13  
musclecar70sfan's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Starting Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 112
From: Central Connecticut
musclecar70sfan is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by Blazers.B.Kewl
I think that's good. Mine usually hangs around there. just over halfway up to the 200 mark right? That's about where it should be.
Yeah just about. At least that's ruled out.
 
Old Apr 8, 2010 | 12:03 PM
  #14  
hayeri1's Avatar
Beginning Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 11
From: Thornton, Co
hayeri1 is on a distinguished road
Cool

You've mentioned you have run the truck low enough on fuel to cause a stumble when stopping. The flat GM fuel tanks are poorly baffled, so a lot of sloshing occurs in the tank. Even with fuel starvation when stopping, there could be a gallon or more of fuel sloshing around in the tank, but it isn't staying near the fuel pump pickup.
Some GM vehicles are so bad, the fuel gauge will move up or down when accelerating or stopping.
Also, when my Blazer is sitting on empty ('94 w/20 gal. tank), it generally takes about 17 gal. to fill it (topped off). The sending unit is incapable of showing the last couple of gallons in the tank, especially when you have a wide, flat tank.
 
Old Apr 8, 2010 | 12:13 PM
  #15  
DSMayo's Avatar
Starting Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 115
From: Spokane Valley, WA
DSMayo is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by hayeri1
Also, when my Blazer is sitting on empty ('94 w/20 gal. tank), it generally takes about 17 gal. to fill it (topped off). The sending unit is incapable of showing the last couple of gallons in the tank, especially when you have a wide, flat tank.
My 2002 is like that as well where it will show empty but only 16-17 gallons will fill her back up. Is it safe to say that if the sending unit cannot read the last couple gallons, the fuel pump will not be able to use that fuel either?

sorry if Im thread jacking
 
Old Apr 8, 2010 | 04:35 PM
  #16  
musclecar70sfan's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Starting Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 112
From: Central Connecticut
musclecar70sfan is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by hayeri1
You've mentioned you have run the truck low enough on fuel to cause a stumble when stopping. The flat GM fuel tanks are poorly baffled, so a lot of sloshing occurs in the tank. Even with fuel starvation when stopping, there could be a gallon or more of fuel sloshing around in the tank, but it isn't staying near the fuel pump pickup.
Some GM vehicles are so bad, the fuel gauge will move up or down when accelerating or stopping.
Also, when my Blazer is sitting on empty ('94 w/20 gal. tank), it generally takes about 17 gal. to fill it (topped off). The sending unit is incapable of showing the last couple of gallons in the tank, especially when you have a wide, flat tank.
That's what I thought. And yes my fuel gauge is pretty bad lol. It does jump up and down on stops and heavy acceleration.
 
Old Apr 8, 2010 | 04:39 PM
  #17  
99blaz's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 249
From: New York Mills/Morrisville, NY
99blaz is on a distinguished road
Default

I average like 15.7 or something and about 70% of my driving is highway so your not getting to bad.
 
Old Apr 8, 2010 | 11:36 PM
  #18  
hayeri1's Avatar
Beginning Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 11
From: Thornton, Co
hayeri1 is on a distinguished road
Cool

Originally Posted by DSMayo
My 2002 is like that as well where it will show empty but only 16-17 gallons will fill her back up. Is it safe to say that if the sending unit cannot read the last couple gallons, the fuel pump will not be able to use that fuel either?

sorry if Im thread jacking
The fuel pump can siphon much more gas than the sending unit can read, but it never removes all the gas from the tank. The sending unit float bottoms on the tank before the tank runs dry.
I don't normally let my Blazer get below 1/4 tank, because the fuel pumps get hot when they are not submerged.
 
Old Apr 10, 2010 | 08:17 PM
  #19  
tjspillman's Avatar
Starting Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1
From: Mocksville,NC
tjspillman is on a distinguished road
Default

Do you know you gear ratio? my wifes 94 and my 96 both have 3:42 gears and we both get about 15-17 mpg. and both are 4x4's. these numbers are pretty close to our window stickers fuel rateing. you could be one of the few that has the 3:73 gears. just a thought.
 
Old Apr 10, 2010 | 08:29 PM
  #20  
truesmack's Avatar
Starting Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 108
From: IA
truesmack is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Yeah, it seems like 3:73 gears hurt your mpg for sure, not sure if I really like the feel either, newer different blazer thou.
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:50 PM.