JL Vs. MD Challenege
#71
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location:
Posts: 23

i like both setups but i vote quality over quantity any day if you can make your system boom like no tomorrow on just quality not not quantity than your the man , but i'd like to see a challenge with low end equipment as per say pyle,lanzar,pyramid,xsite,xxx,power acoustic,etc now thats a challenge i would jump into if you can make cheap **** like that go a long way than that will prove alot ;we all know we can create a booming sound system with high end audio thats why it's high end
but if you can make crap like that sound good ...........................................Makes u think?[sm=trust_me.gif]
but if you can make crap like that sound good ...........................................Makes u think?[sm=trust_me.gif]
#72
BF Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,654











well i hit a 139.4....but i feel as though the meter was not working properly b/c my new amp is 1500 watts as compared to my old 200 watt amp and I hit 137.1 with that one....so i dont feel as though anything was really accomplished
#73
BF Veteran
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampstead Maryland
Posts: 2,612


my amps still in cali
damn fedex! lol
but TL's dont break...... they work fine..... no matter wut lol.
He just held a x2 event! it cant be wrong they test them constantly....
we should buy one as a club!
damn fedex! lolbut TL's dont break...... they work fine..... no matter wut lol.
He just held a x2 event! it cant be wrong they test them constantly....
we should buy one as a club!
#74
BF Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,654











im down....but its something where everyone would have to put out for it...not just like 3 people
#75
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southampton, PA
Posts: 685

ORIGINAL: jagblazer01
well i hit a 139.4....but i feel as though the meter was not working properly b/c my new amp is 1500 watts as compared to my old 200 watt amp and I hit 137.1 with that one....so i dont feel as though anything was really accomplished
well i hit a 139.4....but i feel as though the meter was not working properly b/c my new amp is 1500 watts as compared to my old 200 watt amp and I hit 137.1 with that one....so i dont feel as though anything was really accomplished
#76
BF Veteran
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampstead Maryland
Posts: 2,612


he has a sealed box at like .7 cubes each sub
#77
BF Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,654











its like .95 cubes per sub lol
#78
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southampton, PA
Posts: 685

well that would explain it. throw all the subs you got into one huge ported box thats just a lil over the "largest recommended box volume" of each sub X how many subs u got. then tune it to the resonant frequency of whereever your being mic'ed in your blazer (dash i assume). also completely seal off your vehicle with deadening material. see where that gets you
#79
BF Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,654











i fatmatted the entire truck so that part is covered....how do you figure out the resonant frequency of the truck?
#80
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southampton, PA
Posts: 685

put the subs in a sealed box and play through different frequencies to see which vibrates the dash the most




