Lets talk head units...
#21
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southampton, PA
Posts: 685

ORIGINAL: black19
I'm not buying them purely based on looks, but I honestly can say that it is a part of my decision making process. That being said, what do you think of the decks I mentioned?
ORIGINAL: FatRyan
now u should know that you should never buy any car audio equipment based on looks....
now u should know that you should never buy any car audio equipment based on looks....
#22
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southampton, PA
Posts: 685

looks like maybe an N1 or N2
#23
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Novato, CA
Posts: 234

ORIGINAL: FatRyan
well, i like the functionallity of kenwoods, but i think their sq blows. the pioneer is an excellent deck. and i dont know anything about that alpine. but if its anything like the 9855, stay far far away from it.
ORIGINAL: black19
I'm not buying them purely based on looks, but I honestly can say that it is a part of my decision making process. That being said, what do you think of the decks I mentioned?
ORIGINAL: FatRyan
now u should know that you should never buy any car audio equipment based on looks....
now u should know that you should never buy any car audio equipment based on looks....
#24
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 146

Didn't say pioneer was crap. I said the same thing you did. It is not regarded as high end. I have gone from a top of the line Pioneer Premier to a middle of the row Eclipse and you can hear a difference. To be able to hear a difference just by switching head units means something tremendous happened. You can't say RF, Pioneer, or Alpine doesn't have a crap line....but could you point me in the direction of Eclipse's low end line? They haven't had one. Mark my words though....they will now.
#25
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southampton, PA
Posts: 685

ORIGINAL: HCCAFan
Didn't say pioneer was crap. I said the same thing you did. It is not regarded as high end. I have gone from a top of the line Pioneer Premier to a middle of the row Eclipse and you can hear a difference. To be able to hear a difference just by switching head units means something tremendous happened. You can't say RF, Pioneer, or Alpine doesn't have a crap line....but could you point me in the direction of Eclipse's low end line? They haven't had one. Mark my words though....they will now.
Didn't say pioneer was crap. I said the same thing you did. It is not regarded as high end. I have gone from a top of the line Pioneer Premier to a middle of the row Eclipse and you can hear a difference. To be able to hear a difference just by switching head units means something tremendous happened. You can't say RF, Pioneer, or Alpine doesn't have a crap line....but could you point me in the direction of Eclipse's low end line? They haven't had one. Mark my words though....they will now.
#26
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 146

Seems to me you just keep reiterating my points.
#27
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southampton, PA
Posts: 685

ORIGINAL: HCCAFan
Seems to me you just keep reiterating my points.
Seems to me you just keep reiterating my points.
#28
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 146

No actually I said I never had a problem with Pioneer and found it a good value for the money, however, it has never been regarded as a high end brand UNLESS you are talking about TVs. That sir, is what I said.
#29
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southampton, PA
Posts: 685

ORIGINAL: HCCAFan
No actually I said I never had a problem with Pioneer and found it a good value for the money, however, it has never been regarded as a high end brand UNLESS you are talking about TVs. That sir, is what I said.
No actually I said I never had a problem with Pioneer and found it a good value for the money, however, it has never been regarded as a high end brand UNLESS you are talking about TVs. That sir, is what I said.
#30
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 146

So what do you consider high end? You said Denon but that's worse than Eclipse IMO. What companies numbers stand out above Eclipse or Clarion for that matter?




