Full Size K5 (1969-1991) GMT415 (1992-1994) Tech Discuss any and all full size K5 general tech topics here.

Good news for me...I think

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-15-2010, 11:30 AM
TheBeastofPC's Avatar
Beginning Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 36
TheBeastofPC is on a distinguished road
Default Good news for me...I think

According to my VIN, my Blazer actually has a 6.6L versus the 5.7L I thought it had. Now unless someone swapped over the years, this is pretty good news for me or am I wrong about thinking this. Bigger is better right? Which tranny normally came with this size engine, the turbo 350 or 400?
 
  #2  
Old 09-21-2010, 10:10 PM
TheBeastofPC's Avatar
Beginning Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 36
TheBeastofPC is on a distinguished road
Default

Really, no answers...
 
  #3  
Old 09-21-2010, 11:23 PM
spdfrk_29's Avatar
Beginning Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: canada
Posts: 24
spdfrk_29 is on a distinguished road
Default t-400

I have known of 2 6.6's that my buddys have owned and both had t-400 witch i was told is normal for the sized of engine and t-350 for the 5.7 . anyone correct me if im wrong.
 
  #4  
Old 09-23-2010, 09:56 PM
abig84's Avatar
BF Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: munster indiana
Posts: 3,424
abig84 will become famous soon enoughabig84 will become famous soon enough
Default

i have the 400 on my fullsized truck now. i love it. it kicks the crap out of any 350 i have. lot of torque in these engines. i think the 400 may have came in some of the older 70s blazer. mine came out of a 1973 something. lot of claims of the 400 over heating because of the cylinder walls being so thin but i never ran into that issue
 
  #5  
Old 10-17-2010, 12:05 AM
TheBeastofPC's Avatar
Beginning Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 36
TheBeastofPC is on a distinguished road
Default

I have heard of the over-heating issue as well, but I was told by someone that this issue was fixed in the later engines. I read somewhere that the 6.6L has 300 lbs of torque.
 
  #6  
Old 10-17-2010, 03:08 PM
WarrenC's Avatar
Beginning Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 21
WarrenC is on a distinguished road
Default

You should be able to tell if its a big block just by looking at it lol. As far as the transmission a 350 has a square pan with one corner cut off. the 400 has a asymetrical screwed up looking pan sorry i dont know how else to describe it lol.
 
  #7  
Old 10-17-2010, 08:15 PM
abig84's Avatar
BF Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: munster indiana
Posts: 3,424
abig84 will become famous soon enoughabig84 will become famous soon enough
Default

The 400 has 3 freeze plugs instead of 2 like the 350 and it is externally ballanced so the harmonic ballancer looks all goofy. I thought I had just a 350 til I seen that ballancer and asked a mechanic about it. I think my stock torque was 295 from the factory. But 30 years later I'm sure its dropped a bit. I used to have this enging in a 6000lb burb and when pullin a car you didn't even feel it
 
  #8  
Old 10-19-2010, 04:39 AM
xmradioguy's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 267
xmradioguy is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Actually if it is a 400 its probably still a smallblock which is physically the same size as the 350 The only block of this family, 400 cu in (6.6 L) small-block, was introduced in 1970 and produced for 10 years The reason for the cooling issues in these engines were usually because people put heads on them that had no steam holes,the difference in the 400 to other sbc were the cylinders were siamesed. The reason it is the same physical size as other small blocks is it had a 4.125" bore and 3.75" stroke while the other 327 and 350's had a 4.00" bore and 3.25" stroke.
You can take a 350 block and put a 400 crank with a 3.75" stroke and build a 383 cu in motor with some clearancing in the bottom end.
 
  #9  
Old 10-20-2010, 09:55 AM
TheBeastofPC's Avatar
Beginning Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 36
TheBeastofPC is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by abig84
The 400 has 3 freeze plugs instead of 2 like the 350 and it is externally ballanced so the harmonic ballancer looks all goofy. I thought I had just a 350 til I seen that ballancer and asked a mechanic about it. I think my stock torque was 295 from the factory. But 30 years later I'm sure its dropped a bit. I used to have this enging in a 6000lb burb and when pullin a car you didn't even feel it
I have 3 pulleys attached to the crankshaft and all have belts attached. Would one of those 3 be the balancer?
 
  #10  
Old 10-20-2010, 10:00 PM
WarrenC's Avatar
Beginning Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 21
WarrenC is on a distinguished road
Default

Bottom dead center on the front is your balancer, it is what is commonly marked with a mark for timing too. The thing on this pic with all the markings is a really fancy one but it shows you where it is. http://img141.imageshack.us/i/img0391afg2.jpg/
 

Last edited by WarrenC; 10-20-2010 at 10:12 PM.


Quick Reply: Good news for me...I think



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:27 AM.