Full Size K5 (1969-1991) GMT415 (1992-1994) Tech Discuss any and all full size K5 general tech topics here.

What coolant temperature sender?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2018 | 02:59 PM
  #1  
Panheadguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Starting Member
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4
Panheadguy is on a distinguished road
Default What coolant temperature sender?

Working on K5 1970 Blazer. Has a gauge not a light to monitor engine temp. Put in a later 383 engine and the hole for the sender is 3/8" npt not 1'2"npt which is what the old one is. The original sender is 70-88 ohms at 220'. Anyone know what sender will work with the gauge that has 3/8"npt thread?
Thank you
 
Old Jul 11, 2018 | 08:41 AM
  #2  
Panheadguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Starting Member
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4
Panheadguy is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm sure someone has been here before swapping in a later engine! So can anyone tell me what the ohm temp readings should be for 100' and 220'?
I contacted VDO and with the temp/ohms they can find the correct sender.
 
Old Jul 11, 2018 | 11:40 AM
  #3  
swartlkk's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 41,334
From: Waterloo, NY
swartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I would get a 3/8 male npt to 1/2 female npt adapter (like
THIS ONE THIS ONE
) and use the original sender. If height becomes an issue, get a 90 degree fitting with 3/8 male npt and 1/2 female npt.
 
Old Jul 11, 2018 | 11:54 AM
  #4  
Panheadguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Starting Member
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4
Panheadguy is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks for the suggestion. I thought about this type of adapter but saw this as a less than perfect solution. I'm thinking that the probe end of the sender will be hidden from the coolant and would not give as accurate a reading. I should order a fitting like that but my other concern is the probe end will bottom out before the threads engage.
I do appreciate your input!
 
Old Jul 11, 2018 | 12:07 PM
  #5  
Rusty Nuts's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 811
From: waterford, mich.
Rusty Nuts is on a distinguished road
Default

If you had clearance to drill and tap the 3/8 hole to 1/2 on the intake the aluminum is easy digging.
 
Old Jul 11, 2018 | 12:44 PM
  #6  
Panheadguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Starting Member
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4
Panheadguy is on a distinguished road
Default

I thought about enlarging the hole in the head to 1/2npt but discounted due to clearance issues. The intake manifold on this crate motor looks like GM is out to save Aluminum, not enough meat . Doesn't look like enough depth either to run a tap in far enough to cut full threads.
I ordered a fitting as suggested by Swartikk (?) and if that doesn't pan out I guess accessory gauges are in order.
Again, thanks for the suggestions.
 
Old Jul 11, 2018 | 06:08 PM
  #7  
swartlkk's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 41,334
From: Waterloo, NY
swartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I have to apologize. I read this thread quickly on my phone while I took a break this morning and swore I saw oil pressure sending unit. You are correct in that the adapter I recommended would not allow for the tip of the sending unit if your sender is like what's on my '70 Chevelle & '74 Blazer.

Are you sure of your resistance values? Most GM temperature sending units would be somewhere around 145 ohms at 220F. What is it at room temp (~70F)?

In a bit of web searching, I saw that there were some recommendations to using the Standard Motor Products TS76 sending unit, but I could not find the resistance chart for that sensor. It may also have a different connector than your stock sensor. You could test the TS76 against your stock sender to determine if the resistance values are consistent prior to installation so that you could return it if necessary.

And THIS POST on CorvetteForum.com shows some resistance values for the Duralast TU66 sensor and is stated to work in the newer heads. It also suggests using on of the ports on the front cross-over in the intake manifold which I'm not sure if you've looked into or not.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
smokeyjj
1st Generation S-series (1983-1994) Tech
11
Jul 30, 2012 02:34 AM
zr2dan
2nd Generation S-series (1995-2005) Tech
3
Apr 30, 2012 11:41 AM
fruggy
1st Generation S-series (1983-1994) Tech
2
Mar 3, 2010 01:56 PM
dave5514
Engine & Transmission
13
Jan 15, 2008 08:45 AM
RegSo
2nd Generation S-series (1995-2005) Tech
7
Dec 20, 2007 02:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 PM.