2" body lift=really bad mpg's?
#1
2" body lift=really bad mpg's?
It's kind of retarded to ask. But to the people out there with a 2" body lift and non-stock sized tires give me an idea of how much crappier mpg's? I'm sitting at 16.5mpg consistently with a 2"torsion bar/overload spring lift, and 245/60/18's (around 31"), full brushguard, and a safari rack on top. I'm trying to debate if I'm only going to lose .5mpg I might as well go for it. But if not I'm considering taking everything back to stock. Right now my Blazer is my only vehicle, but it's paid for and I really like driving it.
I'm just trying to weight the cool factor against the functionality. I know a 3" body lift on my 1st gen really made it easier to work on stuff. And for some reason that thing got 20mpg with 3"lift, torsion bars maxed shackles and 31's (to bad it literally rusted in half). The mpg thing must be a vortec thing. My brother has an all stock 94 1st gen and he's lucky to get 16mpg.
I forgot the lift and truck I'm asking about is my 1998 4x4 LT 4door.
I'm just trying to weight the cool factor against the functionality. I know a 3" body lift on my 1st gen really made it easier to work on stuff. And for some reason that thing got 20mpg with 3"lift, torsion bars maxed shackles and 31's (to bad it literally rusted in half). The mpg thing must be a vortec thing. My brother has an all stock 94 1st gen and he's lucky to get 16mpg.
I forgot the lift and truck I'm asking about is my 1998 4x4 LT 4door.
Last edited by closer; 07-29-2012 at 08:48 PM. Reason: added vehicle info
#2
It's kind of retarded to ask. But to the people out there with a 2" body lift and non-stock sized tires give me an idea of how much crappier mpg's? I'm sitting at 16.5mpg consistently with a 2"torsion bar/overload spring lift, and 245/60/18's (around 31"), full brushguard, and a safari rack on top. I'm trying to debate if I'm only going to lose .5mpg I might as well go for it. But if not I'm considering taking everything back to stock. Right now my Blazer is my only vehicle, but it's paid for and I really like driving it.
I'm just trying to weight the cool factor against the functionality. I know a 3" body lift on my 1st gen really made it easier to work on stuff. And for some reason that thing got 20mpg with 3"lift, torsion bars maxed shackles and 31's (to bad it literally rusted in half). The mpg thing must be a vortec thing. My brother has an all stock 94 1st gen and he's lucky to get 16mpg.
I forgot the lift and truck I'm asking about is my 1998 4x4 LT 4door.
I'm just trying to weight the cool factor against the functionality. I know a 3" body lift on my 1st gen really made it easier to work on stuff. And for some reason that thing got 20mpg with 3"lift, torsion bars maxed shackles and 31's (to bad it literally rusted in half). The mpg thing must be a vortec thing. My brother has an all stock 94 1st gen and he's lucky to get 16mpg.
I forgot the lift and truck I'm asking about is my 1998 4x4 LT 4door.
Edit: Also, when your front wheels stick out like mine do, that adds to wind resistance as well. All-terrain or mud terrains knock your mpg even further. Mods suck for gas don't they? lol
#7
Your MPG isn't that bad with what you have done. 2-3 MPG doesn't really make that much of a difference money wise at the pump if you do the math. Did your old blazer have a TBI 4.3? Because they got great MPG in my opinion. My '94 gets less than 15 but I drive it pretty hard.
#8
Well... I removed my brushguard, safari rack, and tail light brush guards.... Just to paint them this weekend. LOL! We''ll see if it gets better mpg anyways.
And my rack has the little wind deflector on it. But I almost think it would catch less air with out the deflector if I don't have anything up there.
And yes, my old blazer had the 4.3 w/TBI system on it. I was so hard on that thing. LOL! And it had 220,000 miles and was an ex-county sheriff's vehicle. At least I can say my blazer I have now. Will soon be to the 220,000mile mark... but it will look much better that the 1st gen.
And by the way... My blazer looks really weird too me with everything off of it.
And my rack has the little wind deflector on it. But I almost think it would catch less air with out the deflector if I don't have anything up there.
And yes, my old blazer had the 4.3 w/TBI system on it. I was so hard on that thing. LOL! And it had 220,000 miles and was an ex-county sheriff's vehicle. At least I can say my blazer I have now. Will soon be to the 220,000mile mark... but it will look much better that the 1st gen.
And by the way... My blazer looks really weird too me with everything off of it.
#9
Dont forget all that stuff you took off has mass as well as a decreased aero. Weight kills mpg light to light, aero kills mpg on the hwy. Check the GM performance book. The dirtest aero on a vehicle is between the bumper and the road. Raise your truck, increase that area; lower your truck, decrease that area. Check the book then you decide.