1st Generation S-series (1983-1994) Tech Discuss 1st generation S-series (1983-1994) general tech topics here.

good idea?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 22, 2007 | 03:47 PM
  #1  
92 blazin's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Beginning Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 23
92 blazin is an unknown quantity at this point
Default good idea?

i was thinking about putting dual exaust on my 92 blazer.. but will it mess with the back pressure?

or should i just get dualls exaust from the muffler, or will that still mess with the back pressure to?

suggestions would help
 
Old Nov 22, 2007 | 05:00 PM
  #2  
HeyYou's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 146
From:
HeyYou is an unknown quantity at this point
Default RE: good idea?

Your engine is basically an air pump. The more air you can move thru it, the better it will run (more power, better efficiency, etc.) Headers, and dual exhaust all the way back will give you a noticable improvement on the Butt-Dyno. The suggestion that you need a certain amount of backpressure, in order for things to work "right" is a Myth.
 
Old Nov 22, 2007 | 08:19 PM
  #3  
swartlkk's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 41,333
From: Waterloo, NY
swartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond repute
Default RE: good idea?

True dual exhaust on a v6 engine sounds pretty bad... If what you want is more performance, you can get that by increasing the exhaust diameter and putting on high flow components (cat & muffler).

While 'required backpressure' is a myth, there is such a thing as oversized exhausts which hinders performance as well.
 
Old Nov 22, 2007 | 10:30 PM
  #4  
Idriveachevy's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 908
From:
Idriveachevy is an unknown quantity at this point
Default RE: good idea?

Is backpressure really just a myth?
 
Old Nov 23, 2007 | 06:45 AM
  #5  
Hanr3's Avatar
BF Veteran
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,890
From: Central Illinois
Hanr3 has a reputation beyond reputeHanr3 has a reputation beyond reputeHanr3 has a reputation beyond reputeHanr3 has a reputation beyond reputeHanr3 has a reputation beyond reputeHanr3 has a reputation beyond reputeHanr3 has a reputation beyond reputeHanr3 has a reputation beyond reputeHanr3 has a reputation beyond reputeHanr3 has a reputation beyond reputeHanr3 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

YES!!!!!!!

Your engine does not need nor does it want backpressure. Backpressure is a restriction to air flow. Every restriction to air flow the engine must overcome to exhuast spent gases. That effort robs you of horsepower. More backpressure = more restriction = less horsepower. It is that simple.




Most people get backpressure confused with is scavenging. Scavenging is when the exhaust pulls the air from the engine. That allows the engine to breath better. In racing engines scavenging is used to pull in the next charge of air/fuel mixture. More you can stuff into the chamber before it explodes the more power you can generate. This is why an engine is reffered to as an air pump. Teh more air it can pump, the more power it makes. If you set your exhaust up correctly it can be used to draw in more air/fuel and create more power. Backpressure has the oppostie effect, it reduces the amount of fresh air/fuel you can draw into the chamber.
 
Old Nov 23, 2007 | 07:19 AM
  #6  
rriddle3's Avatar
BF Guru
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,594
From: Fort Worth,Texas
rriddle3 has a reputation beyond reputerriddle3 has a reputation beyond reputerriddle3 has a reputation beyond reputerriddle3 has a reputation beyond reputerriddle3 has a reputation beyond reputerriddle3 has a reputation beyond reputerriddle3 has a reputation beyond reputerriddle3 has a reputation beyond reputerriddle3 has a reputation beyond reputerriddle3 has a reputation beyond reputerriddle3 has a reputation beyond repute
Default RE: good idea?

True, Tim. 'Backpressure' is a term of convenience that I am guilty of using just for simplicity's sake, but 'scavaging' is the correct idea. As with most things, there is a point of diminishing returns and when an exhaust system is 'too large' andthe flow of gasses becomes too much in volume and too slow in speed, performance can start to suffer. This is why, for the 4.3's design, going over 2.5" for the exhaust pipe is pretty much uselesseven if you have installed headers to optimize the initial flow of exhaust gas. Staying with the stock 2.25" is probably the route to take. I also agree with Kyle that dual exhaust lines on our trucks accomplish nothing and do not have a good sound.
 
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 10:30 AM
  #7  
sdm1234's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 42
From:
sdm1234 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default RE: good idea?

you can, however, use a 2.5in dual exhaust setup with an x-pipe. that will help equalize opposing pressure and, in turn, increase exhaust scavenging. not only will it help HP and low-end TQ, it'll sound better with an x-pipe, as well.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
davtak
General Chat
21
Sep 20, 2007 03:31 PM
vicskim1
General Chat
2
Jun 1, 2007 03:32 PM
davtak
Paint, Body, & Interior
3
Oct 2, 2006 11:07 PM
mojoman13
Engine & Internal
7
Sep 21, 2006 10:51 PM
il67bp
Suspension Tech
2
Oct 7, 2005 01:16 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:49 PM.