1st Generation S-series (1983-1994) Tech Discuss 1st generation S-series (1983-1994) general tech topics here.

Irrational Air-Fuel Mixture

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-29-2011, 02:17 AM
Toby Hanson's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Graham, WA
Posts: 818
Toby Hanson will become famous soon enough
Default Irrational Air-Fuel Mixture

I put my Snap-On MT-2500 scanner on my '94 Blazer (W) after I got it running well (I had another thread about the tune-up and disconnected vacuum line). All the values looked good except the Air-Fuel Ratio. It should read about 14.7. It read 0. Why would it read 0 in closed loop mode?
 
  #2  
Old 12-29-2011, 07:00 AM
swartlkk's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 41,173
swartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond repute
Default

What you are looking at is likely the fuel trim which is a % off of baseline used to modify the baseline values depending on what the O2 sensors are telling the ECU. 0% means it is operating at baseline values with no modifications.
 
  #3  
Old 12-29-2011, 03:40 PM
Toby Hanson's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Graham, WA
Posts: 818
Toby Hanson will become famous soon enough
Default

I don't think it's the fuel trim that I'm viewing. It's labeled A/F Ratio. Short-term and long-term fuel trim are both labeled separately. When I put the scanner on my wife's '93 Jimmy it says 14.7. Did that measurement change between the '93 and '94 CPI motors?
 
  #4  
Old 12-29-2011, 05:00 PM
swartlkk's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 41,173
swartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond repute
Default

If I were you I wouldn't pay attention to the value. Watch the trims to see how well the engine is operating in relation to the fuel map values and watch the O2 sensor output in mV. Narrow band sensors such as these trucks have a non-linear response so accurate AFR outside of their typical 14.7:1 operating range isn't that reliable.
 
  #5  
Old 12-30-2011, 03:03 AM
Toby Hanson's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Graham, WA
Posts: 818
Toby Hanson will become famous soon enough
Default

That's exactly what I wanted to know. Everything else is good: LT fuel trim is 128, O2 sensor is oscillating normally. I'll ignore the 0.0 air fuel ratio.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Swaggner
1st Generation S-series (1983-1994) Tech
1
10-11-2011 11:33 AM
taypac
Engine & Transmission
0
05-23-2010 07:41 PM
Scooterewski
2nd Generation S-series (1995-2005) Tech
5
10-06-2008 07:00 PM
Thor_449
Engine & Transmission
3
09-06-2008 02:33 PM
drewski120
Full Size K5 (1969-1991) GMT415 (1992-1994) Tech
17
04-12-2008 09:31 AM



Quick Reply: Irrational Air-Fuel Mixture



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:18 PM.