2nd Generation S-series (1995-2005) Tech Discuss 2nd generation S-series (1995-2005) general tech topics here.

MAP sensor testing ... '95 4.3 Blazer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-28-2012, 09:53 PM
onebadsuv's Avatar
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 83
onebadsuv is on a distinguished road
Default MAP sensor testing ... '95 4.3 Blazer

With gas prices steadily climbing I've been tweaking My Blazer with the goal of optimizing fuel economy . I was running a set of premium NAPA 8mm wires , a recently installed set of OEM spec delco plugs , cap and rotor with very good results - smooth idle , peppy throttle response and engine timing right at 0 degrees . Gas mileage not that great though ...
No codes or check engine light and easy engine starts , hot or cold .
So I'm at the local pick-n-pull or ******-n-grab junk yard and happen upon a row of (engine component wise) intact 4.3 equipped Jimmys and Blazers so I went to town pulling every sensor and engine control device , wires and parts . I got home and swapped out the
(premium) napa beldon 8mm wires for a near new set of AC Delco 7mm spark plug wires pulled at the yard - go to start the engine and just a bump of the key fires the motor up now . NICE ! Next I swap out the (as far as I know) factory installed MAP sensor with one pulled from the J/Y and go for a test drive ... now I have way better braking and overall drive-ability such as transmission shift points depend on how much throttle I'm giving it . I mean the thing chirps second gear now without even having to get on it much as I found out tonight on a test run - felt like a kid again circling the block
I did find that at least this 4.3 engine seems to run a lot better on the mid grade 89 octane compared to the regular I was running . I get more miles out of a tank in this '95 two door two wheel drive ... I like it .For what I need - She's a keeper
 
  #2  
Old 03-28-2012, 10:10 PM
pettyfog's Avatar
BF Veteran
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SW Central OH
Posts: 2,257
pettyfog has a spectacular aura aboutpettyfog has a spectacular aura about
Default

It would be interesting to see what each of those maps read out on a scantool.
And how they track from atmosphere (engine off) to warm idle against an accurate vacuum gauge

Cannot understand how any of those would affect braking
 
  #3  
Old 03-28-2012, 10:56 PM
onebadsuv's Avatar
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 83
onebadsuv is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by pettyfog
It would be interesting to see what each of those maps read out on a scantool.
And how they track from atmosphere (engine off) to warm idle against an accurate vacuum gauge

Cannot understand how any of those would affect braking
appreciate the response

I can only speculate that the more accurate MAP sensor responds faster to engine intake vacuum and load conditions ? For instance , when approaching a traffic light or stop sign previously the brake pedal was "harder" to push down , right after taking your foot off the accelerator to apply brakes. Engine idle RPM's are similar , 650-700 warmed up . Around 850 to 950 cold at startup then dropping ...
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joejiz
2nd Generation S-series (1995-2005) Tech
10
03-30-2021 02:53 PM
Zach8846
Engine & Transmission
0
03-12-2014 02:07 PM
dannyv
2nd Generation S-series (1995-2005) Tech
1
03-08-2011 05:54 PM



Quick Reply: MAP sensor testing ... '95 4.3 Blazer



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:54 PM.