MAP sensor testing ... '95 4.3 Blazer
#1
MAP sensor testing ... '95 4.3 Blazer
With gas prices steadily climbing I've been tweaking My Blazer with the goal of optimizing fuel economy . I was running a set of premium NAPA 8mm wires , a recently installed set of OEM spec delco plugs , cap and rotor with very good results - smooth idle , peppy throttle response and engine timing right at 0 degrees . Gas mileage not that great though ...
No codes or check engine light and easy engine starts , hot or cold .
So I'm at the local pick-n-pull or ******-n-grab junk yard and happen upon a row of (engine component wise) intact 4.3 equipped Jimmys and Blazers so I went to town pulling every sensor and engine control device , wires and parts . I got home and swapped out the
(premium) napa beldon 8mm wires for a near new set of AC Delco 7mm spark plug wires pulled at the yard - go to start the engine and just a bump of the key fires the motor up now . NICE ! Next I swap out the (as far as I know) factory installed MAP sensor with one pulled from the J/Y and go for a test drive ... now I have way better braking and overall drive-ability such as transmission shift points depend on how much throttle I'm giving it . I mean the thing chirps second gear now without even having to get on it much as I found out tonight on a test run - felt like a kid again circling the block
I did find that at least this 4.3 engine seems to run a lot better on the mid grade 89 octane compared to the regular I was running . I get more miles out of a tank in this '95 two door two wheel drive ... I like it .For what I need - She's a keeper
No codes or check engine light and easy engine starts , hot or cold .
So I'm at the local pick-n-pull or ******-n-grab junk yard and happen upon a row of (engine component wise) intact 4.3 equipped Jimmys and Blazers so I went to town pulling every sensor and engine control device , wires and parts . I got home and swapped out the
(premium) napa beldon 8mm wires for a near new set of AC Delco 7mm spark plug wires pulled at the yard - go to start the engine and just a bump of the key fires the motor up now . NICE ! Next I swap out the (as far as I know) factory installed MAP sensor with one pulled from the J/Y and go for a test drive ... now I have way better braking and overall drive-ability such as transmission shift points depend on how much throttle I'm giving it . I mean the thing chirps second gear now without even having to get on it much as I found out tonight on a test run - felt like a kid again circling the block
I did find that at least this 4.3 engine seems to run a lot better on the mid grade 89 octane compared to the regular I was running . I get more miles out of a tank in this '95 two door two wheel drive ... I like it .For what I need - She's a keeper
#2
It would be interesting to see what each of those maps read out on a scantool.
And how they track from atmosphere (engine off) to warm idle against an accurate vacuum gauge
Cannot understand how any of those would affect braking
And how they track from atmosphere (engine off) to warm idle against an accurate vacuum gauge
Cannot understand how any of those would affect braking
#3
I can only speculate that the more accurate MAP sensor responds faster to engine intake vacuum and load conditions ? For instance , when approaching a traffic light or stop sign previously the brake pedal was "harder" to push down , right after taking your foot off the accelerator to apply brakes. Engine idle RPM's are similar , 650-700 warmed up . Around 850 to 950 cold at startup then dropping ...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joejiz
2nd Generation S-series (1995-2005) Tech
10
03-30-2021 02:53 PM