Builds Whether you are building something new or rebuilding something old, post up your build threads here. Open to all projects!

4.3l to 2.8l Swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-16-2013, 11:15 PM
W9370291's Avatar
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 11
W9370291 is on a distinguished road
Default 4.3l to 2.8l Swap

How Practical is it?
LL2
The carbureted LL2 ("R-code") was produced from 1982 to 1988. Another LL2 ("R-code") with throttle body fuel injection was produced from 1986 to 1993. Output of the TBI version was 125 hp.
1986–1993 Chevrolet S-10/Chevrolet S-10 Blazer

this would happen in a 1989 chevy s10 blazer 4x4 4.3 engine Vin "W"

this is just a thought.
Thank You
 
  #2  
Old 01-16-2013, 11:50 PM
Twip's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bellflower, Cali
Posts: 877
Twip will become famous soon enough
Default

why would you go from a 4.3l to a 2.8l. that doesnt make a whole lot of sense....
 
  #3  
Old 01-16-2013, 11:57 PM
W9370291's Avatar
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 11
W9370291 is on a distinguished road
Talking

never said "I" was or am, Just a thought, always seeing guys going from 262 to 350's just wondering if anyone ever went down
 
  #4  
Old 01-17-2013, 12:12 AM
Twip's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bellflower, Cali
Posts: 877
Twip will become famous soon enough
Default

i would think that if they went down, it would be from a 350 to a 262. i personally have never heard anything good about the 2.8l. and pretty much every one knows that the 4 banger doesnt have any guts to it.
 
  #5  
Old 01-17-2013, 12:13 AM
Carrico4's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 298
Carrico4 is on a distinguished road
Default

The only time they go down they still go up. thats when they swap in a 4bt diesel (pretty much a 4cyclinder). but I have never heard or read of anyone going down. always up. but whatever floats the boat
 
  #6  
Old 01-17-2013, 07:47 AM
neo71665's Avatar
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: rison AR
Posts: 1,940
neo71665 will become famous soon enoughneo71665 will become famous soon enough
Default

Ill take a 60 degree over any 90 degree v6 but I wouldn't swap one out. I'd pull a boat anchor 4.3 for a v8 any day of the week tho.



I don't understand why taking going from completely different families and comparing same families. I can see 2.8 to 3.1 or 3.4 60 degrees since they the same family and don't require all new parts. Compare a 3.3 to a 3.8 or a 4.3 90 degree v6.
 

Last edited by neo71665; 01-17-2013 at 07:53 AM.
  #7  
Old 01-17-2013, 09:59 AM
1sttimejimmyowner's Avatar
Super Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Port huron,Mi
Posts: 1,279
1sttimejimmyowner is on a distinguished road
Default

The 2.8 is a crappy engine if you want to go down go with GM 3.8
 
  #8  
Old 01-17-2013, 10:28 AM
Diaita's Avatar
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Port Alberni, BC
Posts: 1,437
Diaita will become famous soon enough
Default

The 2.8 wouldnt bolt in, the bellhousing is different. That said, if you had the transmission to go along with the 2.8, its certainly possible. The 4.3 is a far better engine than the 2.8 imo.
 
  #9  
Old 01-17-2013, 10:42 AM
W9370291's Avatar
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 11
W9370291 is on a distinguished road
Default

Thank You to all who replied, it was just a thought thats all, my dream is to drop a 350 into my blazer but ill wait till the 262 gives out on me first.
 
  #10  
Old 01-17-2013, 12:10 PM
richphotos's Avatar
BF Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 4,861
richphotos has a spectacular aura aboutrichphotos has a spectacular aura aboutrichphotos has a spectacular aura about
Default

Would be interesting, Not sure why you would do this.
 




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 PM.