Do yall like that feel?
i didnt think the k&n was worth it, no difference. even if it had better air flow, computers not tuned for it. and the cleaning kit is $20 and you get 2-3 uses out of it, and if your cleaning it that often your actually hurting its performance, according to k&n anyways. I remember reading that, in the jist of it, a partially "dirty" k&n air filter will help filter more particles from the air. Not to mention the oil thats coating your maf sensor and collecting dirt.
i didnt think the k&n was worth it, no difference. even if it had better air flow, computers not tuned for it. and the cleaning kit is $20 and you get 2-3 uses out of it, and if your cleaning it that often your actually hurting its performance, according to k&n anyways. I remember reading that, in the jist of it, a partially "dirty" k&n air filter will help filter more particles from the air. Not to mention the oil thats coating your maf sensor and collecting dirt.
I live on a dirt road, the filter gets dirty as crap in the summer. The cost on buying one K&N compared to being nickle and dimed to death every time I would have to buy a paper filter made it worth it to me in savings alone. Plus the simple fact I don't have to drive 30+ miles to go get a filter or keep a spare one in stock. When I clean my filter it needs it so I'm not hurting anything and if you are only getting 2-3 uses out of the cleaning kit you are over using the soap and oil. Over oiling is the problem people have with the maf sensor if the oil is coming out the back of the filter you are prolly using 3 times the amount of oil you actually need. I've ran K&Ns on all kinds of GM products from a 78 nova to a 2004 GMC and have not had the first problem with them.



