Headers, Intake, & Exhaust Custom Exhaust? New Headers? Need Opinions on Intakes? Discuss making your ride breathe better here.

dual exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-14-2009, 08:19 PM
longslide's Avatar
Beginning Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 22
longslide is on a distinguished road
Default dual exhaust

will dual exhaust benifit my 3.4 l engine or should i just go with single.
 
  #2  
Old 12-15-2009, 03:00 AM
rriddle3's Avatar
BF Guru
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fort Worth,Texas
Posts: 6,595
rriddle3 has a reputation beyond reputerriddle3 has a reputation beyond reputerriddle3 has a reputation beyond reputerriddle3 has a reputation beyond reputerriddle3 has a reputation beyond reputerriddle3 has a reputation beyond reputerriddle3 has a reputation beyond reputerriddle3 has a reputation beyond reputerriddle3 has a reputation beyond reputerriddle3 has a reputation beyond reputerriddle3 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Without anybody having dyno results, I'll say stay with single.
 
  #3  
Old 12-15-2009, 06:23 AM
swartlkk's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 41,137
swartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Single can be made to perform just as well as dual and in some cases better. It all depends on the operating characteristics of the motor and how well you can make the exhaust scavenge.
 
  #4  
Old 12-15-2009, 05:39 PM
neo71665's Avatar
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: rison AR
Posts: 1,940
neo71665 will become famous soon enoughneo71665 will become famous soon enough
Default

A 60 degree v6 (2.8, 3.1, and the 3.4) in a truck doesn't wind enough RPMs to benefit from duals. You will be much happier with a single 2 1/2 inch exhaust system.

Truth of the matter most vee designed engines in street driven trucks never see the RPMs that the full benefit of duals even makes sense compared to keeping the torque higher in the lower RPMs like a properly sized single exhaust does.
 

Last edited by neo71665; 12-15-2009 at 05:43 PM.
  #5  
Old 12-15-2009, 06:15 PM
Phil's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 741
Phil is on a distinguished road
Default

Gotta agree with these guys. I do not see how these trucks could benefit from having true dual exhaust, unless serious engine modifications have been performed- porting heads & intake manifold, cam, detailed tuning. Stick with a 2 1/2 single in system. If you want the look of duals, get a single in/dual out muffler and see if a shop can fab something up. Looks like the gas tank would possibly be in the way though.

EDIT- If you have a 3.4l V6 and not a 4.3l (I'm playing Devil's advocate that it might be a typo since I don't recall the 3.4 going into Blazers, but never know if a swap has been done), then I can assure you from the dyno numbers F-body V6 guys have done- duals on those engines actually do not gain as much HP as a single system does due to a drop in back pressure (could be remembering wrong about the back pressure, been a few years). Again, the way to get around that slight loss is custom tuning which is going to cost.
 

Last edited by Phil; 12-15-2009 at 06:18 PM.
  #6  
Old 12-15-2009, 11:26 PM
neo71665's Avatar
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: rison AR
Posts: 1,940
neo71665 will become famous soon enoughneo71665 will become famous soon enough
Default

Originally Posted by Phil
Gotta agree with these guys. I do not see how these trucks could benefit from having true dual exhaust, unless serious engine modifications have been performed- porting heads & intake manifold, cam, detailed tuning. Stick with a 2 1/2 single in system. If you want the look of duals, get a single in/dual out muffler and see if a shop can fab something up. Looks like the gas tank would possibly be in the way though.

EDIT- If you have a 3.4l V6 and not a 4.3l (I'm playing Devil's advocate that it might be a typo since I don't recall the 3.4 going into Blazers, but never know if a swap has been done), then I can assure you from the dyno numbers F-body V6 guys have done- duals on those engines actually do not gain as much HP as a single system does due to a drop in back pressure (could be remembering wrong about the back pressure, been a few years). Again, the way to get around that slight loss is custom tuning which is going to cost.
(playing devil's advocate)
Hes got a 2.8 (said in other posts) and the 3.4 is a common direct swap for it. The factory system on a 2.8 truck is either 2 or 2 1/4 I can't really remember its been so long since I've had a stock one. The 2 1/2 is an upgrade but since the displacement is so low (even on a 4.3) it doesn't have any gains to go any bigger than 2 1/2.

I also highly suggest against ever running a "true dual" on anything as some type of balance pipe (x or H) helps the engine.

The back pressure thing is a sore subject and everybody has an opinion on the subject. From personal experience I've found the 2 1/2 inch single exhaust keeps the power in a more useable RPM range for most any street driven truck. Now if you want to try to be driving around like a ricer bumping a rev limiter all the time sure duals are the way to go.
 
  #7  
Old 12-16-2009, 07:07 AM
Phil's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 741
Phil is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by neo71665
(playing devil's advocate)
Hes got a 2.8 (said in other posts) and the 3.4 is a common direct swap for it. The factory system on a 2.8 truck is either 2 or 2 1/4 I can't really remember its been so long since I've had a stock one. The 2 1/2 is an upgrade but since the displacement is so low (even on a 4.3) it doesn't have any gains to go any bigger than 2 1/2.

I also highly suggest against ever running a "true dual" on anything as some type of balance pipe (x or H) helps the engine.

The back pressure thing is a sore subject and everybody has an opinion on the subject. From personal experience I've found the 2 1/2 inch single exhaust keeps the power in a more useable RPM range for most any street driven truck. Now if you want to try to be driving around like a ricer bumping a rev limiter all the time sure duals are the way to go.
I know the stock piping on my cousin's 2.8 Camaro was 2 1/4, so I guess it'd be the same on an S-series truck. The general rule I was taught on upgrading exhaust pipe diameter was to not go more than 1/2 inch bigger than stock, and often times 1/4 inch upgrade will be a better bottom end gain.

Sorry, I kinda fuddled by saying "true dual". I'm still used to f-body talk and when someone talks about going to "dual" exhaust, 9/10 times they mean a single in/dual out muffler to have the dual look. On those forums we had to ask if thats what they meant or if they wanted real duals. Just been kinda automatic in my thought process on duals over the years to include an H-pipe or X-pipe in my thought when saying "true duals". Its a habbit I need to break haha.
 
  #8  
Old 12-17-2009, 12:03 PM
longslide's Avatar
Beginning Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 22
longslide is on a distinguished road
Default

so just a single exhaust with 2.5 inch pipe
 
  #9  
Old 12-17-2009, 12:05 PM
longslide's Avatar
Beginning Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 22
longslide is on a distinguished road
Default

i may also go with the dual look with resonator tips instead of mufflers
 
  #10  
Old 12-18-2009, 05:34 PM
longslide's Avatar
Beginning Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 22
longslide is on a distinguished road
Default

i can get 2.5 inch stainless steel pipe at work that should work right?

( the pipe will be free leftovers )
 


Quick Reply: dual exhaust



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 PM.