Eww...
#32
12-08-2009, 10:01 PM
Wow...WTF are some people thinking. The Blue truck looks like a three car pile up!!! The red blazer looks like something out of a horror movie! Seriously folks??? I think it's time for those two guys to go get some new glasses. As for the 1970 K5... LOVE IT!!!! Thats how things are done right!!!
#34
12-13-2009, 12:00 AM
Is this a fair price for...metal?
http://edmonton.kijiji.ca/c-cars-veh...AdIdZ171642585
Or for the same price...
http://edmonton.kijiji.ca/c-cars-veh...AdIdZ174003792
http://edmonton.kijiji.ca/c-cars-veh...AdIdZ171642585
Or for the same price...
http://edmonton.kijiji.ca/c-cars-veh...AdIdZ174003792
Last edited by RangerG; 12-13-2009 at 12:03 AM.
#35
12-13-2009, 12:11 AM
consider the following; he doesn't state if it's a RT, SE, or an RT SE. he does state that it's originally a 383 car (a little less desireable), but he also doesn't list any of the other important info in the listing either.
such as, if the fender tag is still on the car, if there was a build sheet in the seats (worth more than the price of gold with a matching fender tag). and being from California isn't all everyone thinks it is. i had a friend bring a '71 Challenger up from Cali 2 years ago (was a local dealer, so the cars history shows it being in state, and a coastal car it's whole life), and was asured the car was very clean-"a 8.5/10" he was told. well he replaced the trunck pan, and both front floor pans since they were rotted almost completely through (the drives one actually had a 4 x 7 inch section that looked like cheese cloth).
so for 6 grand, not bloddy likey (some assembly required, eh?)
see Curtis, being a Mopar man has it's benifits!
sorry, didn't see the 2nd one while i was typing away. the Porche is a way better deal. plus you could drive it away!
such as, if the fender tag is still on the car, if there was a build sheet in the seats (worth more than the price of gold with a matching fender tag). and being from California isn't all everyone thinks it is. i had a friend bring a '71 Challenger up from Cali 2 years ago (was a local dealer, so the cars history shows it being in state, and a coastal car it's whole life), and was asured the car was very clean-"a 8.5/10" he was told. well he replaced the trunck pan, and both front floor pans since they were rotted almost completely through (the drives one actually had a 4 x 7 inch section that looked like cheese cloth).
so for 6 grand, not bloddy likey (some assembly required, eh?)
see Curtis, being a Mopar man has it's benifits!
sorry, didn't see the 2nd one while i was typing away. the Porche is a way better deal. plus you could drive it away!
#37
12-17-2009, 10:20 AM
Super Member
That 70 K5 looks a little odd to me. It stands out way too much in the picture. I think it's photoshopped... or at least tweaked. Somethin is wierd about it. And this darn keyboard keeps leaving letters out of my words!!!! Stupid HP.
#38
01-15-2010, 04:58 PM
What is wrong with people on kijiji!!
http://toronto.kijiji.ca/c-cars-vehi...AdIdZ179774818
Edit:
Faith restored.
http://toronto.kijiji.ca/c-cars-vehi...AdIdZ172585428
http://toronto.kijiji.ca/c-cars-vehi...AdIdZ179774818
Edit:
Faith restored.
http://toronto.kijiji.ca/c-cars-vehi...AdIdZ172585428
Last edited by RangerG; 01-15-2010 at 05:04 PM.
#39
01-15-2010, 05:37 PM
^^^ WOW!
if you removed the air brush work, that redickuluss exhaust (yes, it was on purpose), and the so-so rims, it might astually be a nice truck.
as for the second one, nice 'n clean. although, it looks like it should be sitting lower with that front bumper.
if you removed the air brush work, that redickuluss exhaust (yes, it was on purpose), and the so-so rims, it might astually be a nice truck.
as for the second one, nice 'n clean. although, it looks like it should be sitting lower with that front bumper.
#40
04-18-2010, 08:31 PM
Hmm...interesting paint. Not sure what those light guards are trying to prove either...
http://edmonton.kijiji.ca/c-cars-veh...dIdZ199392521#
http://edmonton.kijiji.ca/c-cars-veh...dIdZ199392521#