February 2010 Nominations
#51
yeah it would have hurt less if the work i put into it getting the rims to sit flush and looking so clean would have stayed that way. dude didnt want to pay my price so we worked something out with it on stock wheels and no spacers or system.
#52
The randomization could not be redone. We would have to move up the next person in line. Changing the number of entries in the randomization may result in a different top 5 all together, possibly removing a current entry in the voting thread.
Given that we are so close to the start of the voting, we could remove Chad and add in another if that is Chad's choice. Alex, you should post the randomization results that were used listing the top 5 and then the runners up.
Given that we are so close to the start of the voting, we could remove Chad and add in another if that is Chad's choice. Alex, you should post the randomization results that were used listing the top 5 and then the runners up.
#53
I don't know what happened, but the randomization is coming out different for me now. I did choose the 7th, but for some reason it's not the same. This is what I'm getting now:
[email protected]
cbr995
davtak
packofqtips
Swartlkk
bandidolenny
Oleyella
Rebels01Blazer
speterson1011
I don't see any point to removing Chad. Just because he sold his ride there is no reason to remove him. It's a lot more headache then it's worth. Beyond that with the randomization coming out different now it would be a completely different list. I dunno, maybe I messed something up this month?
[email protected]
cbr995
davtak
packofqtips
Swartlkk
bandidolenny
Oleyella
Rebels01Blazer
speterson1011
I don't see any point to removing Chad. Just because he sold his ride there is no reason to remove him. It's a lot more headache then it's worth. Beyond that with the randomization coming out different now it would be a completely different list. I dunno, maybe I messed something up this month?
#54
List pre-randomization (nomination order):
List after randomizing on random.org using 1-07-2010:
But once the randomization occurs, the removal of any selected nominee from the voting should be met with a replacement using the next member in the list if possible. If we are already far along into the voting, the spot should just be left vacant rather than have a new person in the running who would be at a disadvantage.
- cbr995
- [email protected]
- davtak
- Rebels01Blazer
- speterson1011
- packofqtips
- swartlkk
List after randomizing on random.org using 1-07-2010:
- [email protected]
- cbr995
- Rebels01Blazer
- swartlkk
- davtak
- speterson1011
- packofqtips
But once the randomization occurs, the removal of any selected nominee from the voting should be met with a replacement using the next member in the list if possible. If we are already far along into the voting, the spot should just be left vacant rather than have a new person in the running who would be at a disadvantage.
#55
ehh its not that big of a deal.....you can leave me in.
#56
hahaha whoops
. I knew there had to be something wrong. I knew I did it right back when I made the thread lol. My bad. I think I had a few too many beers when I re-randomized last night
.
Anyway, good to hear you'll stay in Chad. Take it this way - if you win, it's a good way to remember the awesome Blazer you had and a good way to say bye to it
Anyway, good to hear you'll stay in Chad. Take it this way - if you win, it's a good way to remember the awesome Blazer you had and a good way to say bye to it








