1st Generation S-series (1983-1994) Tech Discuss 1st generation S-series (1983-1994) general tech topics here.

I'm only getting 14 mpg?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 03-31-2010, 05:26 PM
warthogdriver's Avatar
BF Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bay City, Michigan
Posts: 2,785
warthogdriver is a jewel in the roughwarthogdriver is a jewel in the roughwarthogdriver is a jewel in the roughwarthogdriver is a jewel in the rough
Default

sounds like my ride...i avg 14.5 mpg...now that i upgraded the overhead console...i am depressed reading that.
i do get 22 on highway...just alot of crappy city driving.
 
  #12  
Old 03-31-2010, 07:25 PM
Blazers.B.Kewl's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 277
Blazers.B.Kewl is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Originally Posted by musclecar70sfan
No problem... I make the same mistakes all the time lol. Thanks for the advice! Regarding the thermostat, my temp gauge (on the dash) usually hangs around in the 170-185 range. Is that OK?
I think that's good. Mine usually hangs around there. just over halfway up to the 200 mark right? That's about where it should be.
 
  #13  
Old 03-31-2010, 08:29 PM
musclecar70sfan's Avatar
Starting Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 112
musclecar70sfan is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by Blazers.B.Kewl
I think that's good. Mine usually hangs around there. just over halfway up to the 200 mark right? That's about where it should be.
Yeah just about. At least that's ruled out.
 
  #14  
Old 04-08-2010, 12:03 PM
hayeri1's Avatar
Beginning Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Thornton, Co
Posts: 11
hayeri1 is on a distinguished road
Cool

You've mentioned you have run the truck low enough on fuel to cause a stumble when stopping. The flat GM fuel tanks are poorly baffled, so a lot of sloshing occurs in the tank. Even with fuel starvation when stopping, there could be a gallon or more of fuel sloshing around in the tank, but it isn't staying near the fuel pump pickup.
Some GM vehicles are so bad, the fuel gauge will move up or down when accelerating or stopping.
Also, when my Blazer is sitting on empty ('94 w/20 gal. tank), it generally takes about 17 gal. to fill it (topped off). The sending unit is incapable of showing the last couple of gallons in the tank, especially when you have a wide, flat tank.
 
  #15  
Old 04-08-2010, 12:13 PM
DSMayo's Avatar
Starting Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Spokane Valley, WA
Posts: 115
DSMayo is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by hayeri1
Also, when my Blazer is sitting on empty ('94 w/20 gal. tank), it generally takes about 17 gal. to fill it (topped off). The sending unit is incapable of showing the last couple of gallons in the tank, especially when you have a wide, flat tank.
My 2002 is like that as well where it will show empty but only 16-17 gallons will fill her back up. Is it safe to say that if the sending unit cannot read the last couple gallons, the fuel pump will not be able to use that fuel either?

sorry if Im thread jacking
 
  #16  
Old 04-08-2010, 04:35 PM
musclecar70sfan's Avatar
Starting Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 112
musclecar70sfan is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by hayeri1
You've mentioned you have run the truck low enough on fuel to cause a stumble when stopping. The flat GM fuel tanks are poorly baffled, so a lot of sloshing occurs in the tank. Even with fuel starvation when stopping, there could be a gallon or more of fuel sloshing around in the tank, but it isn't staying near the fuel pump pickup.
Some GM vehicles are so bad, the fuel gauge will move up or down when accelerating or stopping.
Also, when my Blazer is sitting on empty ('94 w/20 gal. tank), it generally takes about 17 gal. to fill it (topped off). The sending unit is incapable of showing the last couple of gallons in the tank, especially when you have a wide, flat tank.
That's what I thought. And yes my fuel gauge is pretty bad lol. It does jump up and down on stops and heavy acceleration.
 
  #17  
Old 04-08-2010, 04:39 PM
99blaz's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New York Mills/Morrisville, NY
Posts: 249
99blaz is on a distinguished road
Default

I average like 15.7 or something and about 70% of my driving is highway so your not getting to bad.
 
  #18  
Old 04-08-2010, 11:36 PM
hayeri1's Avatar
Beginning Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Thornton, Co
Posts: 11
hayeri1 is on a distinguished road
Cool

Originally Posted by DSMayo
My 2002 is like that as well where it will show empty but only 16-17 gallons will fill her back up. Is it safe to say that if the sending unit cannot read the last couple gallons, the fuel pump will not be able to use that fuel either?

sorry if Im thread jacking
The fuel pump can siphon much more gas than the sending unit can read, but it never removes all the gas from the tank. The sending unit float bottoms on the tank before the tank runs dry.
I don't normally let my Blazer get below 1/4 tank, because the fuel pumps get hot when they are not submerged.
 
  #19  
Old 04-10-2010, 08:17 PM
tjspillman's Avatar
Starting Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mocksville,NC
Posts: 1
tjspillman is on a distinguished road
Default

Do you know you gear ratio? my wifes 94 and my 96 both have 3:42 gears and we both get about 15-17 mpg. and both are 4x4's. these numbers are pretty close to our window stickers fuel rateing. you could be one of the few that has the 3:73 gears. just a thought.
 
  #20  
Old 04-10-2010, 08:29 PM
truesmack's Avatar
Starting Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: IA
Posts: 108
truesmack is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Yeah, it seems like 3:73 gears hurt your mpg for sure, not sure if I really like the feel either, newer different blazer thou.
 


Quick Reply: I'm only getting 14 mpg?!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:23 AM.