Builds Whether you are building something new or rebuilding something old, post up your build threads here. Open to all projects!

body swap? 1992 frame/1987 body

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2018 | 11:45 AM
  #1  
eazyrider4life's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
New Member
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 2
eazyrider4life is on a distinguished road
Default body swap? 1992 frame/1987 body

stalled out..
I have a 1992 full size blazer that I put a lot of work into (6 " lift, strong 350, big tire, exhaust ect), but my newly 16yr old daughter rolled it (soft roll/body damage only).
I also have an all original 1987 full size blazer 61k miles. It had been sitting for a few yrs, but runs ok for a 305.
Question is I will have to add $$ to the 87 to get the drivetrain up to my standards, as I run em hard hunting here in IOWA.
Is a body swap possible? not worried about resale/original value as I will keep em in the family? or do I invest in the 87 and build it up to my specifications? lift? what type? tires/wheels, exhaust ect..
 
Old Jun 17, 2018 | 01:47 PM
  #2  
swartlkk's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 41,334
From: Waterloo, NY
swartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Putting a SFA square body on an IFS frame...Sacrilegious!

Build the K5!
 
Old Jun 18, 2018 | 10:41 AM
  #3  
Tajohns34's Avatar
Super Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,542
From: Glen Rock, PA
Tajohns34 is on a distinguished road
Default

I agree with Swartlkk. I would rather have the IFS vehicle.
 
Old Jun 18, 2018 | 11:28 AM
  #4  
swartlkk's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 41,334
From: Waterloo, NY
swartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond repute
Default

In my opinion...SFA all day when it comes to ease of use/modification. The IFS setups are restrictive to say the least. IFS can ride nicer than a leaf spring SFA, but that's about the only plus in my book. Sure, great IFS setups can be built, but you'll spend a lot more time and money doing it. All depends on your goals and pocketbook.
 
Old Jun 25, 2018 | 12:03 PM
  #5  
eazyrider4life's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
New Member
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 2
eazyrider4life is on a distinguished road
Default

I agree, the SFA would not be bad to lift/modify, but everything was already completed on the 1994 IFS. The frame on the 1987 K5 is so/so needs exhaust, tires, wheels, lift ect. Its all original, but the 1994 has been beefed up tried/true. It was a GREAT running/Hunting rig.. I just wanted to see if its feasible to switch frames without too many complications. Wheel base difference was minimal. The wrecked body on the 1994 is beyond repair, but the 1987 is still in very good condition.
 
Old Jul 5, 2018 | 07:27 AM
  #6  
Tajohns34's Avatar
Super Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,542
From: Glen Rock, PA
Tajohns34 is on a distinguished road
Default

I meant to say SFA. I must not have been awake when I commented.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ASF
Paint, Body, & Interior
0
Jul 16, 2014 04:34 AM
nismo_2005
Steering, Suspension & Drivetrain
4
Jul 12, 2011 02:55 PM
ktmrider34
Full Size K5 (1969-1991) GMT415 (1992-1994) Tech
2
Oct 25, 2010 09:38 PM
hrn006@aol.com
Builds
9
Jan 6, 2010 06:33 PM
csutton419
Paint, Body, & Interior
4
Aug 24, 2009 08:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:15 PM.