Engine & Internal Chat about beefing up your Blazer's engine insides here.

2.8L engine performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-20-2010, 05:03 PM
drogg1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 4
drogg1 is on a distinguished road
Default 2.8L engine performance

I have a 1985 Chevy s10 Blazer with a 2.8L V6. It's stock as can be and I was wondering if anyone had any suggestions performance wise. Is it worth doing anything at all to a 2.8l? Also, where are some places I can find performance parts for the 2.8L besides Summit?

Keep in mind that I am pretty knowledgeable when it comes to cars/things mechanical.

Any help/advice is appreciated.

Thanks
 
  #2  
Old 01-20-2010, 05:05 PM
swartlkk's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 41,137
swartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Not worth the effort to even think about it.

The best upgrade you'll get is with a motor swap to the 3.4L v6 from a Camaro/Firebird.
 
  #3  
Old 01-20-2010, 09:28 PM
neo71665's Avatar
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: rison AR
Posts: 1,940
neo71665 will become famous soon enoughneo71665 will become famous soon enough
Default

Depends on what you wanna do. Most every upgrade you can do to the 2.8 will swap over to a 3.4 if you do decide to go that route later on. Saying its not worth the effort is in the eyes of the beholder because of this. Its not like you are just throwing money at it on parts you will never be able to use again.

You being carbed the first thing I would suggest it ditching the problematic 2 barrel on it for a decent aftermarket one. This will require a new intake and unless you are extremely lucky and find one of the ones no longer made Eldebrock is the only option.

They make headers and cams for a 2.8. Also swapping out your rocker arms to 1.6 (roller or non) will wake it up a bit.

If you really wanna get into it, swapping heads to the 86+ off of a fuel injected 2.8 will help.

If you really wanna look in to doing work on it without being harrased by people telling you to not waste your time or throw a 350 in it I have a few s-series and 60 degree engine forums that are more friendly. Just shoot me a PM
 
  #4  
Old 01-20-2010, 09:32 PM
bigkhans's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 266
bigkhans is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by neo71665
Depends on what you wanna do. Most every upgrade you can do to the 2.8 will swap over to a 3.4 if you do decide to go that route later on. Saying its not worth the effort is in the eyes of the beholder because of this. Its not like you are just throwing money at it on parts you will never be able to use again.

You being carbed the first thing I would suggest it ditching the problematic 2 barrel on it for a decent aftermarket one. This will require a new intake and unless you are extremely lucky and find one of the ones no longer made Eldebrock is the only option.

They make headers and cams for a 2.8. Also swapping out your rocker arms to 1.6 (roller or non) will wake it up a bit.

If you really wanna get into it, swapping heads to the 86+ off of a fuel injected 2.8 will help.

If you really wanna look in to doing work on it without being harrased by people telling you to not waste your time or throw a 350 in it I have a few s-series and 60 degree engine forums that are more friendly. Just shoot me a PM
So how would a weber work out?
 
  #5  
Old 01-20-2010, 09:55 PM
neo71665's Avatar
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: rison AR
Posts: 1,940
neo71665 will become famous soon enoughneo71665 will become famous soon enough
Default

Originally Posted by bigkhans
So how would a weber work out?

Personally I don't care for them but there are guys out there that do like em. Once tuned they run fine I guess but can be really picky on tuning.
 
  #6  
Old 01-20-2010, 10:15 PM
drogg1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 4
drogg1 is on a distinguished road
Default

What cars and year models did the 3.4L come? Is it a direct swap?

Do you mean upgrading to an aftermarket 2 barrel or 4 barrel? I would think even the smallest 4 barrel would be a little large. Also, what aftermarket brands do you recommend specifically?

What sort of power gains should I roughly expect out of headers?

When upgrading to an aftermarket cam, do I have to worry about too much lift with the stock valve springs?

Would rocker arms with a cam also have any valvetrain issues?

Also, is it cost effective to do all of these things versus finding a cheap small block V8 or 4.3l V6 and swapping them in? I suppose I should crunch my own numbers but I'm curious if it was known off-hand.

Thanks. Any advice is helpful even if it is to say that the 2.8l is a dog.
 
  #7  
Old 01-21-2010, 02:25 PM
Mczuk's Avatar
Starting Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Stavanger, Norway
Posts: 160
Mczuk is on a distinguished road
Default

The advice I got back when I had my 84 s-10 was to swap in a 2.8 from a camaro, they came with more power from the factory 115 for the truck and 140 I think for the camaro. Never got around to it though so I can't verify.
 

Last edited by Mczuk; 01-21-2010 at 02:33 PM.
  #8  
Old 01-21-2010, 05:25 PM
Phil's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 741
Phil is on a distinguished road
Default

My cousin has a 2.8 in his 87 Camaro. I don't think it even has 100hp from the times I've driven it lol.
 
  #9  
Old 01-21-2010, 06:19 PM
neo71665's Avatar
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: rison AR
Posts: 1,940
neo71665 will become famous soon enoughneo71665 will become famous soon enough
Default

drogg1, to answer your questions in order:

93-95 camaros and firebirds.
http://members.shaw.ca/betterthanyou...ine%20swap.htm



2 or 4, holley makes a 4 barrel thats under 400 cfm (390 if I recall) that will work. Personally I would stick with a 2.

About the same as any other engine. Hard to put an exact number cause there are so many factors that can screw with the outcome.

yes, just like with any other engine

yes just like any other engine

I wouldn't waste my time with swapping a 4.3 in where a 2.8 was. Too much of a headache for only gaining about 10 HP over the direct swap 3.4.

Originally Posted by Mczuk
The advice I got back when I had my 84 s-10 was to swap in a 2.8 from a camaro, they came with more power from the factory 115 for the truck and 140 I think for the camaro. Never got around to it though so I can't verify.
Originally Posted by Phil
My cousin has a 2.8 in his 87 Camaro. I don't think it even has 100hp from the times I've driven it lol.
Horsepower 125, Torque 150 for s-series and Horsepower 130, Torque 160in for the f-bodies 1987.

Much better off putting a 3.1 or 3.4 out of a f-body vs just putting the same engine (2.8) back in it. Only difference was cam and fuel injection setups on the 2.8s in f-bodies Not big enough power gains to justify swapping out the engine when you can put the f-body cam in a s-series easy enough.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lowmiles
Engine & Internal
0
07-07-2010 01:30 PM
pink45
Engine & Transmission
4
06-15-2010 08:57 PM
95 S10 Blazer
Engine & Transmission
3
06-29-2009 07:16 PM
Halflifezr2
Engine & Internal
18
01-07-2005 01:30 AM
01xtreme
Engine & Internal
2
09-24-2004 06:01 AM



Quick Reply: 2.8L engine performance



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 PM.