MT or AT
Thread Starter
|
New Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 68
From:
RE: MT or AT
ORIGINAL: aris_unlimited
I was actually looking at the General Grabber A/T's
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....es&place=8
I compared them to a lot of tires there and they are decently priced (cheaper then the others I was looking at), have a higher warranty, and they were rated fairly close together. Plus they have a slightly more aggressive tread pattern in my opinion.
I was actually looking at the General Grabber A/T's
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....es&place=8
I compared them to a lot of tires there and they are decently priced (cheaper then the others I was looking at), have a higher warranty, and they were rated fairly close together. Plus they have a slightly more aggressive tread pattern in my opinion.
Super Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,317
From: Ashland, Kentucky
RE: MT or AT
how do you figure they smoke the BFG AT's?? never heard that before... have a buddy with a silverado that junked his grabbers for a set of BFG AT's... have 6,000 miles onmy bfg'sand they still look brand new
Super Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,980
From: Appleton, WI / Houghton, MI
RE: MT or AT
BFG AT's are the way to go, my friend has BFG AT's on his ranger and has put 8k miles on them and they still look new (thats offroad and on road driving + lots of snow). These are the tires I am going to put on my blazer this fall.
-Lenny
-Lenny
