As good as we think they are?
#1
As good as we think they are?
Hi all just wanted to get people thoughts on. are the stock blazers as good off roading (mud running) as people say and think. i have a 93 blazer 4 door and it seems to suck in 4 wheel. no posi no locker in the front so 2 wheels spin, 1 front and back. is this the set up on these trucks?
my buddy 250 kills me in the winter and id bet a million dollars he would in the mud to. do u run lockers and or posi? is it just my blazer? how do u fair?
my buddy 250 kills me in the winter and id bet a million dollars he would in the mud to. do u run lockers and or posi? is it just my blazer? how do u fair?
#2
RE: As good as we think they are?
I have an 87 model 2.8l v6 and this thing kicks *** in the mud and on trails!!! I have a friend that has a 1998 Jeep and his brother has a 1993 Jeep and they both said my little blazer is just as capable as their Jeeps!!! Pics attached.
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...g?t=1230436401
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...g?t=1230436401
#3
RE: As good as we think they are?
Most of offroad driving is the driver
#4
RE: As good as we think they are?
as Far as the One wheel spinning on each axle...
That is actually as designed.
It is to prevent each axle from Binding during a turn.
you can installed limited slip differentials, air lockers etc to alleviate this, however your ride quality on pavement and tires WILL Suffer.
There is a thread covering all of that in drive trains I believe.
Search "Lockers"
That is actually as designed.
It is to prevent each axle from Binding during a turn.
you can installed limited slip differentials, air lockers etc to alleviate this, however your ride quality on pavement and tires WILL Suffer.
There is a thread covering all of that in drive trains I believe.
Search "Lockers"
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
charlesandstacey
The Lounge
30
03-20-2013 06:36 PM
TheBeastofPC
Full Size K5 (1969-1991) GMT415 (1992-1994) Tech
20
02-06-2011 05:08 PM
butters
Engine & Transmission
5
02-07-2009 10:59 AM