2019 Chevy Blazer Revealed
#41
Ugh! As a daily driving family hauler, I’m sure it’s fine, but if I want body on frame capability, it’s either keep my 2001 forever (and it’s perfect for towing a pop up trailer) or get a brodozer that costs more than a new BMW. I know the demand for small but capable trucks went away, but I really don’t want an aircraft carrier, and even the new Colorado is just as big (and 3x as powerful) as our 81 C10 was (then again, my Blazer’s 4.3 is substantially more powerful than the 305 in that C10 as well).
That said, that’s not a blazer. It’s a Malibu with slightly bigger tires.
That said, that’s not a blazer. It’s a Malibu with slightly bigger tires.
#42
Beginning Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 14

#43
Also it looks most like a Toyota Venza.
Weird styling aside, if the Blazer looked just like it does now, but was rear wheel drive with a 4hi/4lo transfer case, i'd probably buy it (assuming it's not going to be $45,000).
The messed up thing is that the truck you are talking about already exists!! All this "suv" overload, but every last one has to be car based. They can't give us their one truck based small SUV that they already make. Just make a version with styling that matches the colorado. No major R&D work needed. And boom, an SUV that I'm sure most of us would complain about, but we'd still like it. Personally I want a 2-door S10 4x4 Blazer back but that's not going to happen (even though Wranglers are selling as hot as ever). But at least the 2nd gen Trailblazer would have been a step in the right direction.
I've often said that if someone had hoarded brand new Blazers (in my case, a 2 door ZR2) and started reselling them, I'd be all over it. Even though I disagree about it's towing abilities. I've always struggled to tow at highway speeds with my 4.3L's. Great at street speeds though. My current Trailblazer is a 5.3L and it really shines when it's towing. If I could get a truly mint condition S10 Blazer, I'd probably invest in a professionally done V8 swap. Replace the radio with a modern Carplay based radio, and i'd be happy as **** for many years. If I had to get rid of this Trailblazer today, the only thing I could really replace it with is a Wrangler, which would not be ideal because it's also my daily driver. And it's not idea because wranglers + highway towing = :-(
Last edited by l008com; 07-22-2018 at 04:12 PM.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: South Carolina midlands
Posts: 848

I like the trailblazer with the 5.3L LS V8. but the V8 trail bkzr's are very hard to find. So think about this as an option: a 1996-2001 Chevy Tahoe or a GMC Yukon. With the 5.7L Vortec V8. on hwy, it gets 18-19 mpg, good for towing, and not as big and bulky as the new Tahoe/Yukons. That Vortec V8 has a lot in common with the 4.3L V6 Vortec.
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: South Carolina midlands
Posts: 848

I am trying to say in my post above is that i like the 5.3 chevy V8, but feel uncomfortable with the straight six engine found in most of the Trailblazers. the 5.3 L option was rare.
That Tahoe 18-19 mpg figure is, of course, HWY MPG's, not around town driving. .
That Tahoe 18-19 mpg figure is, of course, HWY MPG's, not around town driving. .
#47
Originally Posted by [email protected]
I am trying to say in my post above is that i like the 5.3 chevy V8, but feel uncomfortable with the straight six engine found in most of the Trailblazers. the 5.3 L option was rare.
That Tahoe 18-19 mpg figure is, of course, HWY MPG's, not around town driving. .
That Tahoe 18-19 mpg figure is, of course, HWY MPG's, not around town driving. .
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






