General Chat Chat about all things Blazer (and related vehicles). Off-topic stuff should be in the lounge, and all mechanical problems should be posted in the proper forum.

Rear suspension on 96

Old Dec 18, 2007 | 02:05 PM
  #1  
dimmuborgir6nik6's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 498
From:
dimmuborgir6nik6 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Rear suspension on 96

I've always noticed it looks like it has a small life to it compared to the front. Does the 96, and any other models that look like this have a factory t-bar crank? Or just some sort of factory life to it?
If the front had the same amount of lift to it, I would put bigger tires on.
 
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 02:14 PM
  #2  
swartlkk's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 41,334
From: Waterloo, NY
swartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond reputeswartlkk has a reputation beyond repute
Default RE: Rear suspension on 96

I think you mean lift, not life... Anyway, are you stating that the back is higher than the front or the opposite way around?
 
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 03:51 PM
  #3  
dimmuborgir6nik6's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 498
From:
dimmuborgir6nik6 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default RE: Rear suspension on 96

Haha, yeah, I even said it more than once..

The rear looks like it has more of a lift to it. I've never took the time to measure it, but it's noticable.

 
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 07:04 PM
  #4  
drperry's Avatar
BF Veteran
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,946
From: GP AB CA
drperry is a jewel in the roughdrperry is a jewel in the roughdrperry is a jewel in the rough
Default RE: Rear suspension on 96

The rear on all Blazer's is like an inch or 2 higher...
 
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 09:35 PM
  #5  
dimmuborgir6nik6's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 498
From:
dimmuborgir6nik6 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default RE: Rear suspension on 96

Yeah, thought so.
Why is that? Extra strength for the leaf springs if you're carrying/pulling something heavy?
 
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 09:58 PM
  #6  
cliro's Avatar
Super Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,205
From: Calgary, AB
cliro is an unknown quantity at this point
Default RE: Rear suspension on 96

engine weight.
 
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 10:30 PM
  #7  
dimmuborgir6nik6's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 498
From:
dimmuborgir6nik6 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default RE: Rear suspension on 96

That's what I used to figure, but I thought it couldn't possibly be that heavy. I guess so then.
 
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 03:53 AM
  #8  
drperry's Avatar
BF Veteran
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,946
From: GP AB CA
drperry is a jewel in the roughdrperry is a jewel in the roughdrperry is a jewel in the rough
Default RE: Rear suspension on 96

The front of my Blazer is about 200 - 250lbs heavier than the rear, if I remember right...

Plus, the IFS is pretty soft...
 
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 04:13 AM
  #9  
dimmuborgir6nik6's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 498
From:
dimmuborgir6nik6 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default RE: Rear suspension on 96

It's a pretty large engine on a not that big a truck, so I can understand how there's a large weight difference.
I guess it looks cooler, though.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BlazerGuy2001
Suspension Tech
8
Jan 5, 2010 06:47 AM
BusaJoe
Steering, Suspension & Drivetrain
11
Dec 14, 2009 10:04 AM
mikeknuckey
Full Size K5 (1969-1991) GMT415 (1992-1994) Tech
2
Dec 1, 2009 05:01 PM
Black_04_Blazer
General Chat
2
Oct 19, 2009 08:15 AM
Seabbatical
General Chat
11
Dec 27, 2007 04:10 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:51 AM.